Author: efgwalt

There are a lot of myths and misunderstandings around Electric Vehicles (EVs) in the UK. We’ve made a list of some of these covering concerns about range, charging infrastructure, running costs, and safety. Some are due to now out of date problems with earlier technologies and have become the accepted truth. In the text of this blog we try to address these with some facts and include references to sources and also added some points from our own experience of owning an EV for about a year.

We hope that by debunking these myths, individuals can make more informed decisions about transitioning to electric vehicles and the benefits they offer for both personal and environmental reasons.

1. Charging Infrastructure, Range and Long Journeys:

Myth: EVs can’t travel far enough for long journeys.

Reality: Modern EVs have significantly increased ranges, with many models offering over 250 miles on a single charge (range reduces in cold weather as battery performance drops). The UK’s charging infrastructure is also expanding, making long journeys easier with readily available charging stations.

The Department of Transport research shows that 99% of car journeys are under 100 miles, easily covered by a single EV charge.

Personal View: “Range Anxiety” was certainly something that worried us when we first got our EV and our first experience wasn’t positive. However, we’ve had no issues since including on a road trip around Ireland! I think that there are plenty of online sources of information that help locate EV charging stations and with a bit of modest planning no trip is daunting anymore. On a long journey we tend to find that we need a break at the same time that we need to charge the car.

Myth: There aren’t enough EV charging options.

Reality: While more charging stations are needed, the UK’s public charging infrastructure is growing rapidly. Analysis by Zapmap shows public charge points have grown from 28,460 at the end of 2021 to 53,865 at the end of 2023 and more than 73,000 by the end of 2024. Between April 2024 and April 2025 the public network has grown by 30%.

The latest ZapMap Survey reports that 80% of EV drivers charge at home, alleviating some of the public charging demand.

If you need an EV charger installing then a good place to start is the government list of approved home charging installers. Some energy companies and EV car dealerships can also arrange the install.

Personal View: We mostly charge at home (see Costs below). Charging on a longer journey is more expensive but about equivalent to the price we paid for our petrol car. There are a lot of apps and information available for charging away from home that provide live information on availability etc:

• Motorway charging infrastructure is mainly provided by GridServe
• More local charging availability can be found Octopus Electroverse, Podpoint, Zapmap and many, many more!
• There are even maps covering Ireland (ESB) and the whole of Europe (including UK) (Electromaps).

Myth: The electricity grid won’t be able to handle the increase in EVs

Reality: There are two aspects to this: (1) will there be enough electricity be available to charge EVs and (2) do the electricity grid’s wires have enough capacity for charging EVs?

To address the first point a lot of focus is on using technology to balance the load on the grid out across the day to better match suppy and demand.

As for the second it is probably useful to be aware that the highest peak electricity demand in the UK in recent years was 62GW in 2002. Since then, improvements in energy efficiency mean the nation’s peak demand has fallen by roughly 16%.

Personal View: Our home charger uses technology to work out when to charge our car based on knowing when we need the battery to be charged by, the amount needed and the 1/2 hour periods where the electricity supply is the highest.

As long as the transition is managed correctly and happens at the right pace this should be possible.

2. Costs:

Myth: EVs are more expensive to run than petrol or diesel cars.

Reality: While the initial purchase price of an EV can be higher, their running costs (electricity vs. petrol or diesel fuel) are typically lower. Department for Transport (DoT) information shows that charging a medium-sized electric car at home can cost around half the price of filling up an equivalent petrol vehicle. As of January 2024 charging at home costs around 8p per mile while a diesel or petrol vehicle can cost around 13p to 17p per mile to fuel. 

On average, Zapmap charging price index data shows that the cost of charging an EV on the public network is roughly equivalent to fuelling an equivalent petrol car. GoCompare have an interactive cost of charging calculator tool to help people understand the real costs and benefits of EV charging options.

As well as charging your car there are the annual maintenance costs. Analysis of Book My Garage and RAC service data shows that an EV car service costs less than a petrol/diesel or hybrid car. They found that the average cost of an EV car service was £103, for a petrol car £151, a hybrid car £159 and a diesel car £163. The reason servicing is cheaper is that it requires less labour and as the engines are simpler with less moving parts to go wrong!

Personal View: Our experience of the costs of charging at home are much better than the DoT state. We use a home charger most of the time and with an Octopus EV tariff running overnight we pay only 7p/kWh. To completely charge our 58kWh EV car costs £4.06 and will provide a range of over 200 miles that is the equivalent of 2p per mile.

Our first service at a garage in Garforth was £100.

Myth: EVs are more expensive to purchase than petrol or diesel cars.

Reality: There is some truth in this “myth”. Autotrader Insight analysis shows that new electric cars are 23% more expensive, on average, than an equivalent petrol car. This price gap is decreasing with battery costs reducing and continued innovation, some forecasts predict that some EVs could be around the same price to purchase as a petrol or diesel car by the end of the 2020s.

Of course, not everyone buys new, indeed, most drivers in the UK (around 80%) will buy their cars on the used market where EVs are now similar in price to their petrol and diesel equivalents.

Personal View: The price of EVs was a definate barrier to our purchase of an EV. We got a good deal on a used EV that was a slightly better spec and was about the same price as our old petrol car.

3. Battery Life, Replacement and Recycling:

Myth: EV batteries have a short lifespan and need replacing after only a few years.

Reality: EV batteries are designed to last for many years and miles, with some manufacturers offering warranties of up to 8 years or 100,000 miles. There is no evidence to suggest that EVs have shorter lifespans than their fuel counterparts.

Personal View: As we have only had our EV for about a year its hard to comment on this from personal experience, however, I have heard of anecdotal evidence that some of the early EVs still have batteries with limited levels of degradation.

Myth: EV batteries can’t be recyled.

Reality: EV batteries can be re-used first within stationary storage applications for the home or to support the national grid and then recycled to extract copper, aluminium, cobalt and lithium etc.

Personal View: Not being able to recycle an EV’s battery would be a concern as it would drive up demand for the mining and processing of lithium and other metal ores with the environmental impact that brings. Charpmap have written an interesting blog on this subject and is worth the 6 minute read!

4. Environmental Impact:

Myth: EVs are not environmentally friendly and they pollute more than petrol or diesel cars.

Reality: EVs produce zero tailpipe emissions. However, the manufacturing of EVs involve emissions and there are emissions involved in generating the electricity used to charge their batteries. The Department for Transport reports that EVs emit 67% less carbon emissions compared to petrol or diesel cars over their lifetime.

The vast majority of EV emissions come from their energy-intensive battery manufacturing process. Further environmental damage is caused by the mining of precious metals used in EV batteries. There are efforts underway to produce EV cars in carbon-neutral ways and new technology is beginning to improve the efficiency of batteries, making them lighter and less resource-intensive.

As the national grid decarbonises the electricity used to charge EV batteries will become cleaner. Since 2021, 50% of Britain’s electricity mix came from green sources. You can see how this has improved year-on-year with our link to MyGridGB.

Energy systems are also becoming more flexible to optimise for cleaner energy whenever it’s available. Online tools and apps, new legislation and smart energy tariffs are all helping us manage our electricity use. The smart charger in our home can start or pause our EV charging to ensure it’s using the cleanest and cheapest power.

Personal View: Whilst EVs are better than petrol or diesel cars, EVs still pollute the air with debris from tyre and brake wear, and they are only as low-carbon as the national grid is. Many people drive for journeys which could easily be done by other means. Not using a car is the better environmental option.

5. Safety:

Myth: EVs are more likely to catch fire than petrol or diesel cars.

Reality: EVs are actually less prone to fires than petrol or diesel cars, with data suggesting that EVs are significantly less likely to catch fire. Data from the UK is limited.

Data from the National Transportation Safety Board in the US indicates that there are 25 fires per 100,000 EVs sold, whereas, the rate for petrol and diesel vehicles is significantly higher at 1,530 fires per 100,000 vehicles i.e. 61x higher.

An Office for Zero Emission Vehicles report in 2023 concludes that “Overall, the data currently available suggests that EVs do not present an increased likelihood of fire compared to petrol or diesel equivalents.”

Personal View: I’ve had no experience of this, but trust the data!

Introduction

Electric Vehicles (EVs) are being proposed as a direct replacement for internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles as the solution to the problems they cause. This essay will explore the issues relating to ICE vehicles, what governments are doing to address this, the issues that EVs themselves present and alternatives that they may be distracting us from and why. The focus of this blog will be on cars within the UK as they account for 78% of the distances travelled and with distances increasing by 5.4 billion km per year from 2010 to 2019[9].

The problem with ICEs

Gas and small particle pollution

Human health

The European Union (EU) has over 30% of its oxides of nitrogen (NOx) emissions coming from road transport[12] and these have been shown to increase the severity and susceptibility of people to asthma[29]. There has been an improvement as UK road transport emissions of NOx have fallen by 77% between 1990 and 2017[24].

Carbon monoxide (CO), from the combustion of petrol, catalyses the production of photochemical smog[36] that can contain high concentrations of nitrogen dioxide (NO₂), ozone (O₃) and non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs) such as benzene, that are human carcinogens and can cause airway inflammation and reduced lung function[11]. Again, this issue has been improving as UK road transport emissions of CO have fallen by 94% between 1990 and 2017[24].

Particulate matter (PM), categorised as PM₁₀ (<10µm) and PM_2.5 (<2.5µm) enters into sensitive parts of the lungs, and can aggravate or cause cardiovascular and lung diseases (such as chronic bronchitis[29] and cancers[11]). About 12% of the EU’s PM_2.5 emissions come from road transport and particularly diesel vehicles[12]. From 1990 to 2017 PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 pollution declined, across the UK, by 46% and 57% respectively[24] with the same pattern being seen in the EU[12]. Air pollution remains a problem in cities, for example, during 2019 London had 3,600-4,100 deaths, equivalent to 61,800-70,200 life years lost[7], with other studies estimating higher numbers.

Environment

Gases such as carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide form part of a group of gases known as greenhouse gases (GHG) that drive climate change due to the greenhouse effect whereby they trap heat in the atmosphere by absorbing some outbound infrared radiation and re-radiating some of it to the Earth’s surface. Increases in GHG concentrations since the mid-1700s are unequivocally due to human activities[19].

The climate change they cause has a range of consequences that impact on the environment: temperature changes (predominantly warming and especially at the poles) with a shift of biospheres towards the poles, changes in precipitation patterns, more intense storms, sea-level rise (due to water expansion and melting ice caps), and ocean acidification[19].

Total EU emissions of GHG from road transport was 20% of all emissions in 2013 and are currently around 16% above the levels of 1990[12]. In the UK for 2019, ICE cars make up 16% of all GHG emissions and 61% of the GHG emissions from road transport[5].

As well as climate change NOx from road transport is involved in the production of acid rain[12].

Particulate pollution

In addition to the issues relating to these “tail-pipe” emissions there are also particulate emissions from vehicles because of abrasion of materials from the brakes, tyres, and road surface. These can end up in the marine environment with 2-17% of microplastic pollution in oceans coming from these sources based on estimates from a range of studies[6]. Brakes may be less of a problem for EVs as they can use regenerative braking rather than brake pads[22].

Governmental response

The UK government’s response is summarised within a ten-point plan[33] where the focus is very much on EVs are a solution. Point 4 refers to accelerating the shift to zero emission vehicles with a headline commitment that from 2030 the sale of new diesel and petrol cars and vans will end. There is no recognition that over-consumption is the underlying problem, and the key objectives are to: “simultaneously create jobs, strengthen British industry, cut emissions, and continue travelling”, UK Government[33]. Point 5 references alternatives such as green public transport, cycling and walking.

There is a reluctance to upset the government’s core vote, however, with the correct information people can be led through difficult decisions and balance competing needs. The UK’s Climate Assembly report[18] shows how a typical sample of people think the UK should meet its net zero emissions commitment. The participants created packages of policies including ones that would be controversial on their own. The greatest support included: stopping the sale of ICE cars in 2030, stopping the sale of SUVs now, reduce traffic 2% per decade and no road building until 2045.

The problem with EVs

Emissions

Though EVs are often labelled “zero emission” they are still responsible for emissions, for example, during manufacture and driving where the fuel mix of the electricity generation becomes key.

In the EU, the average EV car is 3x better than the equivalent conventional car and will be 4x better by 2030 as the EU decarbonises its energy generation[32]. Higher figures are quoted by the European Environment Agency[13] with EV cars having 17-30% lower emissions dropping to 73% lower in 2050, again due to fuel mix.

Value chain concerns

A value chain covers the step-by-step actions that take a product from conception to end use and beyond; it covers the production supply chain. Concerns have been raised regarding the value-chain around EVs and more specifically the production of lithium and cobalt used in the manufacture of batteries.

Lithium

Demand for lithium, to be used in batteries, has risen from 18kt in 2010, to 87kt in 2017 and an estimated 509kt in 2025 when it will make up over half the global demand[25]. The primary sources of this metal are Australia and Bolivia where concerns have been raised over political stability and corruption that threatens supplies[30].

As demand increases concerns are raised about the amount that is left to mine and the consequences of exploiting it. The world terrestrial lithium resources are estimated at 86Mt, 25% of which (21Mt) are known reserves[20].

Cobalt

Demand for cobalt, to be used in batteries, has risen from 17kt in 2010, to 41kt in 2017[25] and 140kt in 2020[27] by 2025 it is estimated that it will make up 76% of the global demand with 90% being a by-product of copper and nickel mining[25]. From an ethical point of view cobalt is, perhaps, more of a concern as 65% of global production occurs in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Concerns over the DRC centre around child labour, corruption, crime, poverty, hazardous mining practices, fuel instability and a history of civil war[35]. To compound these issues the current government does not have full control of the country and therefore mining activities[31][3].

The global cobalt resources are about 25Mt, 30% of which (7Mt) are known reserves and more than 120Mt of cobalt resources have been found in manganese nodules and layers on the ocean floor[27].

Monopolies within the cobalt value change continue downstream as China owns 8 of the 14 cobalt mines in the DRC and is the major importer of the raw material and exporter of the refined product[15]. This leaves customers for cobalt with very limited choice. It leaves the power to change prices, but not their processes to tackle issues of low pay etc, in the hands of a limited number of companies and countries[15].

These monopolies work against the increasing demands, by end-users, for transparency of the value-chain[15] as awareness of the issues such as child labour are raised and companies are held to account[1][4].

In both cases, these concerns can make the price volatile and increases risk to any financial investment that is required to smooth the transition for industry.

Mitigations

Manufactures mitigate by developing alternate battery technologies that require a smaller proportion of lithium or cobalt[25]. Indeed, there may be better solutions such as rechargeable proton batteries that use carbon and water[28] but that still need 5-10 years development.

Countries also recognise the risk to their economies and look to secure alternative sources ideally from their own territories, for example, the USA have added cobalt to its critical minerals list[10] that makes it easier to exploit in-country sources.

Part of the solution will be to reduce the demand on raw materials by looking to implement a circular economy model to the fledgling industry. A “6R” model covering reduce, reuse, recycle, recover, redesign, and remanufacture has been proposed[21]. There are many challenges within the model still to be worked out including: standardisation of battery design to reduce raw material inputs and support reuse and recycling, exploration of alternate battery chemistries and the reuse of batteries for grid storage[13]. However, this can create conflict as battery compositions change, they are difficult to standardise and develop reuse and recycling technologies; there is no perfect recovery process[37]. More research, and legislation, is required in anticipation of future recycling demand to offset potential environmental pollution.

Further options have been suggested[13] but will be more commercially challenging for car manufacturers: limit batteries size even at the expense of vehicle range (contradicting a major selling point for manufacturers) and design cars to last longer i.e. have a greater lifetime mileage (undermines manufacture need to sell more cars).

Distractions

It is clear from this, that EVs are not a straightforward solution to the problems of the ICE. There are other solutions to pollution, from road traffic, that have been proposed that may have less of a focus than they should, and perhaps as a result have shown little progress.

By increasing car sharing and occupancy there will be less cars being used if all additional occupants would have driven. However, the UK’s National Travel Survey (NTS) shows the average car occupancy rates have declined by about 2% from 2002 to 2019 and the rate of single occupants has increased by about the same amount[8]. Unfortunately, the current COVID-19 pandemic has worked against this and other initiatives as the NTS shows there has been a 5% shift through 2020 to single occupancy journeys[8]. It remains unclear how long these impacts will last and at what level they will stabilise.

Cars spend 97% of their time parked[26] which represents an unacceptable waste of resources. The NTS shows that the rate of access to cars per adult has continued to rise from 0.42 in the mid-1980s to 0.67 in 2020[8]. Better progress could be made by combining solutions, for example, the Wisselspoor Buildings Project, Utrecht, Netherlands is a dense housing development with car parking space for only 64% of households, but that offers an extensive solar powered electric car sharing scheme. “We Drive Solar”, who operate the scheme, found that 90% of their customers get rid of at least one car, and the distance they drive, per household, is less as the car stops being the default[16]. Car sharing has the advantage of allowing people to select the car they need at the time they need it, for example, a small car to commute or a larger family car for a camping holiday. A significant component of the challenge being faced to make this change is that it involves changes to human behaviour. Cars are a consumer item that people define themselves by[26] and people want to continue to use cars[2].

By switching to other modes of transport or just by travelling less distance by car will also reduce emissions and encourage a move to reduced car ownership. Looking at the NTS[8] and excluding 2020 due to COVID-19 and prior to 2009 due to the UK recession the average trip length and distance travelled were flat at 6.9 miles and 6,600 miles respectively. Using 2009 as an index year, the data shows a very small drop in car driver (-2%) and passenger (-9%) distance travelled with surface rail & cycling distances increasing (28% and 14%) but not walking or buses that dropped to 75-88% of 2009 levels. Using the same index year, shows a very small drop in car driver (-3%) and passenger (-8%) trips. If a mode switch happened, then it was to surface rail and not walking, cycling or buses that declined to 70-84%.

Adding road charges for ICE cars, as happens in the clean air zones of several cities such as Paris[14] and London[17], disincentivises the use of ICE cars and can encourage a transport mode switch or encourage the use of EVs.

Exchanging ICE for EV vehicles remains the default solution for a couple of reasons.

Firstly, the current business models of car manufacturers require that they sell cars and so it is in their interests to continue to sell EVs once ICE cars are banned. There is no incentive for them to eliminate designed obsolescence to create true “sustainable technology” with less frequent model changes and cars with long service life that are easily repairable and serviceable. Car companies are facilitating the status quo agenda by signing up international agreements such as the “Glasgow Declaration on Zero-Emission Cars and Vans”[34] and by running adverts for EVs.

Secondly, it is the easy option: “EVs … offer the easiest substitute behaviour for citizens” [23]. Cars are embedded in our psyche, their infrastructure dominates the design of our cities; they are a habit that is hard to kick[23].

Conclusion

Society cannot continue to consume resources at their current rate and use ICE. Part of the solution is to move to EV to reduce GHG emissions, however, we also need to reduce the number of cars, their usage and increase their longevity as well as promote public transport, cycling and walking. This will make the transition to EVs easier as there would be less demand for supporting grid and charging infrastructure as well as demand for resources.

Now is the time to start using this new technology the way we mean to go on and make it as clean as possible both ethically and environmentally.

References

[1] Amnesty International (2017) Industry giants fail to tackle child labour allegations in cobalt battery supply chains, Amnesty International. Available at: https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2017/11/industry-giants-fail-to-tackle-child-labour-allegations-in-cobalt-battery-supply-chains/.

[2] Anable, J. (2021) ‘Written evidence submitted by Jillian Anable, Professor of Transport and Energy, Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds on behalf of the Centre for Research on Energy Demand Solutions (EVP0113)’. House of Commons, Transport Committee. Available at: https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/22870/pdf/.

[3] BBC News (2021) ‘DR Congo country profile’, BBC News, 4 February. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-13283212.

[4] BBC Panorama (2021) ‘The Electric car Revolution: winners and Losers’, Panorama. BBC. Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m0011wn5/panorama-the-electric-car-revolution-winners-and-losers.

[5] BEIS (2021) Final UK greenhouse gas emissions national statistics: 1990 to 2019. Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (gov.uk). Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/final-uk-greenhouse-gas-emissions-national-statistics-1990-to-2019.

[6] Boucher, J. et al. (2020) The marine plastic footprint. IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature. doi:10.2305/IUCN.CH.2020.01.en.

[7] Dajnak, D. et al. (2021) London Health Burden of Current Air Pollution and Future Health Benefits of Mayoral Air Quality Policies. London: Imperial College London, p. 72. Available at: https://www.london.gov.uk//WHAT-WE-DO/environment/environment-publications/health-burden-air-pollution-london.

[8] DfT (2021a) National Travel Survey: 2020, Department for Transport (gov.uk). Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/national-travel-survey-2020/national-travel-survey-2020.

[9] DfT (2021b) Road traffic statistics, Department for Transport (gov.uk). Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/road-traffic-statistics.

[10] DOI (2018) ‘Final List of Critical Minerals 2018’. US Department of the Interior. Available at: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/05/18/2018-10667/final-list-of-critical-minerals-2018.

[11] EEA (2014) ‘Costs of air pollution from European industrial facilities 2008-2012’. European Environment Agency. Available at: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/costs-of-air-pollution-2008-2012.

[12] EEA (2016) ‘Explaining road transport emissions – A non-technical guide’. European Environment Agency. Available at: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/explaining-road-transport-emissions.

[13] EEA (2018) Electric vehicles from life cycle and circular economy perspectives. 13/2018. European Environment Agency. Available at: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/electric-vehicles-from-life-cycle.

[14] European Union (2021) Urban Access Regulations in Europe – Paris. Available at: https://urbanaccessregulations.eu/countries-mainmenu-147/france/paris.

[15] Farchy, J. and Warren, H. (2018) ‘China Has a Secret Weapon in the Race to Dominate Electric Cars’, Bloomberg.com. Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2018-china-cobalt/.

[16] Fully Charged Show (2021) Gas-Free Houses & Solar Powered Electric Car Sharing. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=chDi85uDy1k.

[17] Greater London Authority (2019) World’s first 24 hour Ultra Low Emission Zone starts in London, London City Hall. Available at: https://www.london.gov.uk//press-releases/mayoral/ulez-launches-in-central-london.

[18] House of Commons (2020) The path to net zero: Climate Assembly UK, Full report, p. 556. Available at: https://www.climateassembly.uk/report/read/final-report.pdf.

[19] IPCC (2021) Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC AR6 WGI. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, p. 3949. Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_Full_Report.pdf.

[20] Jaskula, B. (2021) Lithium Statistics and Information – Mineral Commodity Summaries 2021. US Geological Survey (USGS), p. 2. Available at: https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2021/mcs2021-lithium.pdf.

[21] Kawamura, H. et al. (2021) Frontier Technology Issues: Lithium-ion batteries: a pillar for a fossil fuel-free economy? UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, p. 10. Available at: https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/publication/frontier-technology-issues-lithium-ion-batteries-a-pillar-for-a-fossil-fuel-free-economy/.

[22] Krajinska, A. (2021) Electric vehicles are far better than combustion engine cars when it comes to air pollution. Here’s why, Campaigning for cleaner transport in Europe | Transport & Environment. Available at: https://www.transportenvironment.org/discover/electric-vehicles-are-far-better-combustion-engine-cars-when-it-comes-air-pollution/.

[23] Londakova, K. et al. (2021) ‘Net Zero: principles for successful behaviour change initiatives’, Number 2021/063, Department for Businesses, Energy and Industrial Strategy Research Paper (2021/063), p. 56. Available at: https://cms.qz.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/net-zero-behaviour-change-initiatives2.pdf.

[24] ONS (2019) Road transport and air emissions. Article. Office for National Statistics, p. 13. Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/environmentalaccounts/articles/roadtransportandairemissions/2019-09-16#greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-road-transport-make-up-around-a-fifth-of-uk-greenhouse-gas-emissions.

[25] Ramsbottom, O. et al. (2018) Lithium and cobalt: A tale of two commodities. McKinsey, p. 20. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/metals-and-mining/our-insights/lithium-and-cobalt-a-tale-of-two-commodities.

[26] Robinson, D. (2020) ‘Why understanding consumers is pivotal to mass electric vehicle adoption’, New Statesman Business, 20 January. Available at: https://www.ns-businesshub.com/transport/consumers-electric-vehicle-adoption/.

[27] Shedd, K. (2021) Cobalt Statistics and Information – Mineral Commodity Summaries 2021. US Geological Survey (USGS), p. 2. Available at: https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2021/mcs2021-cobalt.pdf.

[28] Smith, C. (2021) ‘Are we ready for the electric vehicle revolution?’, 5 Live Science Podcast. BBC. Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/p09rl6q9.

[29] Stedman, J. et al. (2019) Air Quality damage cost update 2019. ED 59323. Ricardo Energy & Environment for Defra, p. 54. Available at: https://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/assets/documents/reports/cat09/1902271109_Damage_cost_update_2018_FINAL_Issue_2_publication.pdf.

[30] TheGlobalEconomy.com (2020a) Bolivia Political stability, TheGlobalEconomy.com. Available at: https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/Bolivia/wb_political_stability/.

[31] TheGlobalEconomy.com (2020b) Democratic Republic of the Congo Political stability, TheGlobalEconomy.com. Available at: https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/Democratic-Republic-of-the-Congo/wb_political_stability/.

[32] Transport & Environment (2020) How clean are electric cars? T&E’s analysis of electric car lifecycle CO₂ emissions. Transport & Environment Briefing. Transport & Environment, p. 33. Available at: https://www.transportenvironment.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/TEs-EV-life-cycle-analysis-LCA.pdf.

[33] UK Government (2020) The Ten Point Plan for a Green Industrial Revolution. UK Government, p. 38. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-ten-point-plan-for-a-green-industrial-revolution.

[34] UK Government (2021) COP26 declaration on accelerating the transition to 100% zero emission cars and vans, GOV.UK. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cop26-declaration-zero-emission-cars-and-vans/cop26-declaration-on-accelerating-the-transition-to-100-zero-emission-cars-and-vans.

[35] Visual Capitalist (2020) Ethical Supply: The Search for Cobalt Beyond the Congo, Visual Capitalist. Available at: https://www.visualcapitalist.com/ethical-supply-the-search-for-cobalt-beyond-the-congo/.

[36] Westberg, K., Cohen, N. and Wilson, K.W. (1971) ‘Carbon monoxide: its role in photochemical smog formation’, Science (New York, N.Y.), 171(3975), pp. 1013–1015. doi:10.1126/science.171.3975.1013.

[37] Zhou, L.-F. et al. (2020) ‘The Current Process for the Recycling of Spent Lithium Ion Batteries’, Frontiers in Chemistry, 8, p. 1027. doi:10.3389/fchem.2020.578044.